Comparison of two fly traps for the capture of horse flies (Diptera: Tabanidae)

Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:2007
Authors:D. W. Watson, Denning, S. S., Calibeo-Hayes, D. I., Stringham, S. M., Mowrey, R. A.
Journal:Journal of Entomological Science
Volume:42
Pagination:123-132
Date Published:April
Type of Article:Article
ISBN Number:0749-8004
Keywords:]., America, Collecting techniques, Land zones, Nearctic region, North, Tabanidae (Orthorrhapha)., Tabanidae [Trapping / Trap comparisons / ] [North Carolina / Central /, Techniques, USA
Abstract:

A 2-yr study was conducted to examine differences between two commercially available horse fly traps, the Epps[registered trademark] Biting Fly Trap (Farnum Co., Phoenix, AZ) and the Horse Pal[registered trademark] (Newman Enterprises, Omro, WI), placed on three horse farms located in central North Carolina. Traps captured over 8,422 tabanids, representing 4 genera and 19 species. Tabanus quinquevittatus Wiedemann was the most abundant fly collected (2345), followed by the T. lineola F. species complex (2087), T. fulvulus Weidemann (1397) and T. petiolatus Hine (839). Although the Horse Pal captured more flies than the Epps trap, fly capture differences between traps were not significant for the 2000 and 2001 summer seasons (F = 1.39; df = 3, 143; P = 0.249). The Epps trap was most efficacious for early-season (June and July) trapping of T. quinquevittatus and the T. lineola complex in 2000. In contrast, the Horse Pal was more efficacious for these species during the same period in 2001. The Horse Pal was the preferred trap for relative ease in handling.

URL:<Go to ISI>://ZOOREC:ZOOR14310063008
Scratchpads developed and conceived by (alphabetical): Ed Baker, Katherine Bouton Alice Heaton Dimitris Koureas, Laurence Livermore, Dave Roberts, Simon Rycroft, Ben Scott, Vince Smith